Meetings, Records & Management Accountability
COA Client Case Records Request / Fee DisputeWhen a Board Charges You to Photocopy Your Own Records
An owner's complete statutory records request was mostly approved, but the board refused the AGM video outright and charged a fee for proxies that were already available electronically.
- Situation
- Records request fee dispute
- Request
- Seven categories of statutory records
- Result
- Six approved, one refused, fee charged on proxies
- Central question
- Which fee components have a stated legal basis?
After a fairness question about board-candidate canvassing ahead of an AGM, the owner submitted a statutory Request for Records. The request covered seven categories: the owners and mortgagees list, lease-notice records, twelve months of board minutes, proxies, vote results, scrutineer records, and how quorum was calculated.
The board approved six of the seven categories. It refused the AGM video outright, saying the recording was made only to help write the minutes and was never treated as a corporation record.
It also charged a fee for the proxies, itemized as per-page printing plus an hour of labour. The proxies were described elsewhere as already electronic and deliverable electronically.
The owner brought the fee to Condo Owner Advocate for review. The core question was practical: which parts of the response are governed by the Condominium Act's rules on redaction and fees, and which parts may be an over-charge without a clearly stated legal basis?
Documents an owner in this situation should gather
- The completed statutory Request for Records form, exactly as submitted
- The board's written response, including any redaction explanation and fee breakdown
- Anything the corporation says about how a fee was calculated (page count, printing rate, labour time)
- Confirmation of whether the requested records already exist in electronic form
Questions to ask management or the board
- 1Can the corporation justify each component of this fee separately, especially any printing or labour charge on records that already exist electronically?
- 2What is the corporation's stated basis for refusing a specific record category outright, and does it cite the actual Condominium Act provision?
- 3Does questioning a fee in writing put the underlying records request at risk, or can both be kept open at the same time?
Facing something like this?
Read the plain-language guidance for this exact situation, or run your own documents through the Free Notice Decoder.
Read the full guides
This is a COA Client Case: a situation involving an owner who worked directly with Condo Owner Advocate. It is published only after identifying details were removed or generalized, is not a testimonial, review, or endorsement, and is not legal advice.
