Condo Owner Advocate
Start here

Home/Real Condo Cases/Governance & Board Conduct

Governance & Board Conduct

Community Situation Governance Dispute / Large Capital Project Oversight

A Board Change, Years of Special Assessments, and Three Large Capital Projects

A change in board composition preceded years of rising fees, repeated special assessments, and several large capital projects. This raises questions about oversight, not settled conclusions about wrongdoing.

Sourcing: Anonymized owner scenario, based on a public post shared in an Ontario condo-owner community group. Not a Condo Owner Advocate client file. Company and contractor names from the original source have been removed, since the underlying claims about them, including licensing status and alleged financial arrangements, could not be independently verified.
Situation
Board change followed by rising fees and large capital projects
Projects
Balcony work, pool renovation, garage restoration
Largest project
Garage restoration, approximately $11 to $12 million
Pattern
Near-annual special assessments over roughly eight years

Owners in a mid-size Ontario corporation described a change in board composition roughly a decade ago. After the change, maintenance fees rose significantly and special assessments became near-annual. By one owner's account, assessments applied in most years across roughly eight years. Some owners reported total monthly housing costs well above what they had budgeted for.

Over that period, the corporation undertook three large capital projects. The largest was a garage restoration approved at approximately $11 to $12 million after a structural engineering report described the garage as approaching the end of its expected service life. Owners raised concerns about contractor qualifications and cost oversight, though this account could not independently verify those specific claims.

Owners also reported that requests for in-person requisitioned meetings were repeatedly declined in favour of more limited virtual sessions.

This case is presented for its general pattern, not as a verified account of any specific company's conduct. A run of large, sequential capital projects combined with limited in-person owner meetings is exactly where the reserve fund study, competitive tendering records, and requisitioned-meeting rights become practical tools for getting clarity.

Timeline

  • ~10 years ago

    Board composition changed

    New directors took over governance.

  • Following years

    Fees rose, assessments became near-annual

    Some owners reported total monthly costs well above budget.

  • During period

    Balcony work completed

    Owners raised concerns about contractor qualifications.

  • During period

    Pool and hot tub renovation

    Cost oversight questions raised by owners.

  • During period

    Garage restoration approved

    Approximately $11 to $12 million, after a structural engineering report described the garage as approaching end of service life.

  • Ongoing

    In-person requisitioned meetings declined

    Requests were repeatedly declined in favour of virtual sessions.

Documents an owner in this situation should gather

  • Reserve fund studies from before and after the board composition changed
  • AGM and board minutes covering the years in question
  • The engineering or condition assessment reports behind each major capital project
  • Special assessment notices and the board resolutions approving them
  • Any requisitioned-meeting request correspondence and the corporation's response

Questions to ask management or the board

  • 1What did the reserve fund study recommend for these components before each project was approved, and how did actual costs compare?
  • 2What tendering or competitive-bid process was used to select each contractor?
  • 3Why were in-person requisitioned meetings declined in favour of restricted virtual sessions, and what governs that decision?
  • 4Can complete minutes and vote records for each special assessment approval be provided to owners on request?

Facing something like this?

Read the plain-language guidance for this exact situation, or run your own documents through the Free Notice Decoder.

Read the guidance Try the Free Notice Decoder

See all ways to begin

Read the full guides

How to Requisition a Condo Owners' MeetingReserve Fund Study ExplainedSpecial Assessment Payment PlansCondo Board Conflict: What Owners Can Do
Curated and maintained by Alexander Baraz, Condo Owner Advocate.

This is a Community Situation: a real situation shared publicly by a condo owner, most often in an Ontario Facebook community group. It is an illustrative community case. It is not a Condo Owner Advocate client, not COA casework, not a testimonial, and not legal advice.